Plos one reviewer list. They hav e reviewed 2 paper s for .

Plos one reviewer list All of these algorithms have demonstrated their potential to solve many optimization problems. Mar 15, 2018 · (2017) PLOS ONE 2016 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You. View Article Google Scholar 3. T. Sign in to the private Editorial Board Knowledge Base to learn more about serving on the PLOS ONE Editorial Board. Include your responses to all the reviewers’ and editors’ comments and list the changes you have made to the manuscript. PLOS ONE (plosone. For reference, a one-point increase of a score by a single reviewer improves the position of a submission by 11% on average. Aug 16, 2019 · Nowadays, evaluating the quality of health services, especially in primary health care (PHC), is increasingly important. Oct 5, 2023 · The allocation of public funds for research has been predominantly based on peer review where reviewers are asked to rate an application on some form of ordinal scale from poor to excellent. Adverse pregnancy outcomes are an alarming public issue in different parts of the world and have a seriously harmful influence on both Jan 3, 2025 · Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Nov 18, 2022 · In recent years, United States federal funding agencies, including the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the National Science Foundation (NSF), have implemented public access policies to make research supported by funding from these federal agencies freely available to the public. These results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper accepted for publication may depend upon factors in addition to scientific merit. Nov 18, 2024 · Objective Peer review frequently follows a process where reviewers first provide initial reviews, authors respond to these reviews, then reviewers update their reviews based on the authors’ response. However, it can also bring about a range of issues that may pose serious and potentially life-threatening risks for both the mother and the unborn child. Enforcement is primarily through annual and final reports submitted to these funding agencies, where all Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Oct 15, 2014 · Background Evidence suggests there are inconsistencies in patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment and reporting in clinical trials, which may limit the use of these data to inform patient care. However, unique difficulties associated with the role may place peer recovery support staff [i. (2015) PLOS ONE 2014 Reviewer Thank You. Population health frameworks provide a theoretical grounding for conceptualization of population health and therefore a logical basis for selection of indicators. PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US Save this journal alert Log in to create a weekly email alert for: Peer review Feb 27, 2015 · PLOS and the PLOS ONE editorial team would like to express our tremendous gratitude to all those individuals who participated in the peer review process this past year at PLOS ONE. Together, your efforts enabled the publication of more than 22,000 rigorously reviewed Open Access papers. As far as I am aware, PLOS One includes a rigorous peer-review process as followed by most of the good, genuine journals. This study aimed to systematically evaluate these instruments’ measurement properties and the methodological quality of their related studies within a universally acceptable standardized framework and then PLOS cannot arbitrate if any disputes arise between authors and peer review participants, especially in terms of Materials Transfer Agreements (MTAs). Based on the PLoS ONE Review Speed Feedback System, it takes authors 20. PLOS Global Public Health editors select potential reviewers based on their expertise in research areas relevant to the manuscript under consideration. Yet, human reviewers make errors in inclusion and exclusion of references. Such judgments are sometimes beyond reviewers’ discriminatory power and could lead to a reliance on subjective biases, including preferences for lower risk, incremental projects. Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. There is mixed evidence regarding whether this process is useful, including frequent anecdotal complaints that reviewers insufficiently update their scores. Poor reliability and bias of peer review rating has led funding agencies to experiment with different approaches to assess applications. PLOS is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics . Two specific review panel formats are considered: in-person face-to-face and virtual video conference Feb 23, 2015 · Data “publication” seeks to appropriate the prestige of authorship in the peer-reviewed literature to reward researchers who create useful and well-documented datasets. gondii instigates significant economic losses in sheep and goat farming industry and can lead to abortion, stillbirth, congenital malformations and neonatal losses. Remember, if you choose to publish the peer review history of your manuscript, your response to reviewers will appear online alongside the final List of reviewers: PLos One journal Response to reviewers: Address the specific points made by each reviewer. This scoping review will assess existing peer review guidelines and/or checklists intended for reviewers of biomedical journals and provide an overview on the review guidelines. Registered Report Protocols undergo peer-review to ensure that the planned research will meet the PLOS ONE publication criteria. My go-to approach is to come up with a list of relevant keywords then search for potential reviewers in Google Scholar. Thank you to all our reviewers for generously sharing your Response to reviewers: Address the specific points made by each reviewer. What advice would you give to new Academic Editors joining the PLOS One Editorial Board? Finding reviewers has gotten harder, particularly in certain fields. Apr 12, 2019 · Background Involving community members in identifying and reporting health events for public health surveillance purposes, an approach commonly described as community-based surveillance (CBS), is increasingly gaining interest. They hav e reviewed 2 paper s for . Variability in measured CRP and hsCRP may affect their clinical utility but estimates of within-subject variability are based on limited data. After data collection, the Registered Report manuscript includes the Introduction and Oct 31, 2024 · These guidelines, aimed at authors, reviewers, and editors, are underpinned by: a cross-disciplinary scoping review of existing policy and adherence to these policies; a review of emerging policies, and policies in a specific discipline (learning and technology); and, a collective drafting process undertaken by a reference group of journal Apr 13, 2023 · During submission, the author will send to the editor a list of suggested reviewers, . Instead, Academic Editors pinpoint researchers in the field with related expertise by consulting a variety of sources. 5 days to get the first editorial decision. PLoS ONE 12(3): e0174259. Oct 10, 2024 · Purpose This paper reports a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol that will be used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab, alone or combined with bevacizumab and other therapies, in adult women with cervical carcinoma from stage IB2 onwards. Oct 22, 2024 · Background Dance is a promising health resource for older adults, but empirical evidence remains inconsistent. In this study, we aim to investigate Dec 27, 2024 · Many peer-review processes involve reviewers submitting their independent reviews, followed by a discussion between the reviewers of each paper. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to Please contact PLOS ONE staff at plosone@plos. Dec 12, 2022 · In this article, we analyze the association between author-suggested reviewers and review invitation, review scores, acceptance rates, and subjective review quality using a large dataset of close to 8K manuscripts from 46K authors and 21K reviewers from the journal PLOS ONE’s Neuroscience section. PLOS ONE editors select potential reviewers based on their expertise in research areas relevant to the manuscript under consideration. Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the journal's Editorial Manager submission system. In this work, we present a transformer-based, neural-network architecture that only PLOS ONE Section Editors are experts in the fields of research they serve, experienced in the peer review process, ambassadors for Open Science, and active participants in their communities. We conducted a Our volunteer Academic Editors oversee the peer review process from beginning to end, taking responsibility for conducting an initial assessment based on the PLOS One publication criteria, finding and securing reviewers, evaluating their feedback, making editorial decisions, and communicating decisions to authors. Dec 9, 2013 · IntroductionClinical practice guidelines can improve healthcare processes and patient outcomes, but are often of low quality. Another source suggested offering incentives to reviewers, such as publishing their name in an annual list of reviewers in the journal, offering free copies of the journal or access to Jan 14, 2020 · Background Automated approaches to improve the efficiency of systematic reviews are greatly needed. We shed light on this question by conducting a randomized controlled trial at the Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Nov 29, 2021 · Purpose Recent calls to improve transparency in peer review have prompted examination of many aspects of the peer-review process. Much published research across all medical specialties is not useful, may be misleading, wasteful and even harmful. Peer-review systems often allow confidential comments to editors that could reduce transparency to authors, yet this option has escaped scrutiny. After data collection, the Registered Report manuscript includes the Introduction and Dec 12, 2024 · In our proposed methodological review, we will develop a list of risk of bias items and concepts, so that a risk of bias tool specific to ACTs can be developed. For trials with a PRO endpoint, routine inclusion of key PRO information in the protocol may help improve trial conduct and the reporting and appraisal of PRO results; however, it is currently unclear Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. The below list provides general guidelines on what makes a suitable reviewer. May 10, 2011 · View the PLOS ONE reviewer guidelines for more information about serving as a reviewer. A collection of free training and resources for peer reviewers of PLOS journals—and for the peer review community more broadly— drawn from research and interviews with staff editors, editorial board members, and experienced reviewers. They serve as advisors to the journal staff in their corresponding section , working on special issues including policy development and reporting guidelines. Here is a list of blogs that PLOS have published in recent years that touch on the topic of peer review. gondii Apr 27, 2012 · Background Pre-publication peer review of manuscripts should enhance the value of research publications to readers who may wish to utilize findings in clinical care or health policy-making. The inclusion criteria were as . Guideline appraisal tools aim to help potential guideline users in assessing guideline quality. May 10, 2011 · This video shows PLOS ONE Editorial Board members how to search for and invite a reviewer to a manuscript using tools in Editorial Manager. g. e. To access your review assignment or submit your review now, enter the PLOS ONE submission system. org if you have questions regarding your work and compliance with accepted ethical standards. The lack of synthesised evidence regarding program design, dose, and delivery limits understanding of factors influencing participation and health outcomes. The key argument for anonymization is to mitigate bias, whereas arguments against anonymization posit various uses of author identities in the review process. The names of our 2015 PLOS ONE reviewers are listed in S1–S5 Reviewer Lists. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0121093. Registered Report: primary research articles that describe the findings from a study preregistered as a Registered Report Protocol. Feb 23, 2016 · During 2015 PLOS ONE published over 28,000 research articles. Mar 31, 2023 · For example, one source in our review recommended offering peer reviewers monetary compensation (e. The objective of this protocol is to evaluate worldwide seroprevalence of T. , peers] at high risk for negative workforce outcomes, including burnout, vicarious trauma, and compassion fatigue Editors should be aware of the author list and author affiliations when they invite reviewers to review a manuscript in order to reduce the likelihood of inviting individuals with potentially competing interests that would disqualify them from participating in the peer review process. We conducted a systematic review of publications describing guideline appraisal tools in order to identify and compare existing tools. This paper provides an in-depth survey of well-known optimization algorithms. PLOS ONE waives all formatting requirements until your manuscript has received a provisional Editorial Accept decision. Methods The protocol follows PRISMA-P recommendations and was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024531233). This scoping review aimed to map the scope, range, and effectiveness of dance programs for older people, and identify gaps and Feb 27, 2019 · PLoS ONE 13(3): e0194158. (2017) PLOS ONE 2016 Reviewer and Editorial Board Thank You. A clearer understanding of the impact of these roles will inform global priorities for advanced practice nursing education, research, and policy. While clinical visit agenda-setting has been acknowledged as an important element of patient-centered communication, the effectiveness of Jul 2, 2024 · Introduction The World Health Organization (WHO) called for the expansion of all nursing roles, including advanced practice nurses (APNs), nurse practitioners (NPs) and clinical nurse specialists (CNSs). Aug 26, 2022 · Peer review, commonly used in grant funding decisions, relies on scientists’ ability to evaluate research proposals’ quality. Mar 6, 2019 · reviewer for the journal PLOS ONE. Although Healthy Cities has been implemented in thousands of settings, no synthesis of implementation experiences have been conducted. In a historical perspective, the Department of Health (United Kingdom) developed and proposed a range of indicators in 1998, and lately several health, social and political organizations have defined and implemented different sets of PHC quality indicators. , honorarium) as an incentive to reduce reviewer delays . 2014 was an amazing year for PLOS ONE; during the year, over 80,000 reviewers from around the world and across disciplines provided their expert input that led to publication of over 30,000 articles. The search will be conducted Dec 29, 2023 · Background Toxoplasma gondii, a cosmopolitan protozoan parasite causes toxoplasmosis in humans and many species of domestic and wild animals. May 10, 2011 · The reviewer list in Editorial Manager is an excellent source of contact information for past reviewers, however it is not intended as a resource for selecting reviewers. This would not have been possible without the contribution of more than 76,000 reviewers from around the world and a wide range of disciplines. Authors are expected to comply with Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Rejection rate however does not relate to reviewer age. PLOS ONE abides by its Code of Conduct and aims to adhere to its Best Practice Guidelines. May 10, 2011 · To invite reviewers now, visit the PLOS ONE submission system. Remember, if you choose to publish the peer review history of your manuscript, your response to reviewers will appear online alongside the final List of reviewers: PLos One journal May 20, 2021 · Background Peer review is widely used in academic fields to assess a manuscript’s significance and to improve its quality for publication. MethodsAmong others we searched MEDLINE Dec 13, 2023 · This global umbrella review aimed to synthesise evidence of socioeconomic inequalities in the uptake of routine vaccinations and identify the mechanisms that may contribute to the association. 23 on a 5-point Likert item. Mar 20, 2017 · PLOS and the PLOS ONE team would like to express our sincere gratitude to all of you who lent us your valuable time and expertise as an academic editor, as a guest editor, or as a peer reviewer in 2016. The peer review history package includes the editorial decision letter for each revision, with reviews, and your responses to reviewer comments, including attachments. May 18, 2015 · Many swarm optimization algorithms have been introduced since the early 60’s, Evolutionary Programming to the most recent, Grey Wolf Optimization. This journal belongs to the first quartile (Q1) of SJR ranked journals and In 2016, PLOS ONE depended upon over 5,000 academic and guest editors to manage the nearly 50,000 articles submitted, which were assessed by nearly 70,000 reviewers. PLOS also provide a Peer Review Center , which has helpful tips if you are just starting out as a peer reviewer and you can sign-up to receive the Peer Review Toolbox directly to your 1 day ago · Introduction Many family members and the expectant mother view pregnancy as a time of joyful anticipation. This will help ensure that your submission is complete and gets handled as quickly as possible. Our study explores 1) how reviewers use the confidential comments section and 2) alignment between comments to the Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. All accepted manuscripts must have at least one external reviewer. But, numerous new and ongoing experiments in implementation have not yet resolved what a data publication Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. These articles are compelling narrative reviews that discuss current developments in a particular field under the Collection’s scope and draw meaningful conclusions Dec 9, 2024 · Introduction Peer recovery support services are a promising approach for improving harm reduction, treatment, and recovery-related outcomes for people who have substance use disorders. To find a member, browse the list, or search by name, country/region, Section or Classification. Objective To identify gaps in advanced Our Academic Editors oversee the peer review process from beginning to end, taking responsibility for conducting an initial assessment based on the PLOS ONE Criteria for Publication, finding and inviting reviewers, evaluating their feedback, making editorial decisions, and communicating decisions to authors. (PDF) S4 Reviewer List. Methods PubMed, Embase, and Allied and Complementary Medicine (AMED Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. The scholarly communication community has embraced data publication as an incentive to document and share data. When testing any of these approaches, the criterion standard of comparison (gold standard) is usually human reviewers. The list of Editorial Board members syncs daily with Editorial Manager. The suggested reviewers are chosen from a larger set of possible reviewers —such that is a subset of . Objectives To determine citation false inclusion and false exclusion rates during abstract screening Mar 20, 2017 · Alphabetical list of 2016 PLOS ONE peer reviewers (K–O). Oct 20, 2022 · Background The Healthy Cities project supports municipal policymakers in the struggle to safeguard the health of urban citizens around the world (and in other limited geographies such as islands). org) is a scholarly, peer-rev iewed journal published . Reporting guidelines are tools that in addition to helping authors prepare better Oct 29, 2024 · One publisher that is committed to peer review, is PLOS. We conducted a scoping review to list terms and definitions used to characterize CBS, to identify and summarize available guidance and recommendations, and to map If your submission is accepted for publication, you’ll be invited to opt-in to publish the peer review history of your manuscript using a form in our submission system. May 10, 2011 · To register and invite a new reviewer now, enter the PLOS ONE submission system. A common question among policymakers is whether the reviewers of a paper should be anonymous to each other during the discussion. Methods and analysis We will perform a systematic database search to capture studies that have proposed or reviewed items pertaining to methodological risk, bias, and/or quality in ACTs. Jul 7, 2023 · In terms of the effect size, by citing a reviewer’s work, a submission has a non-trivial chance of getting a higher score from the reviewer: an expected increase in the score is approximately 0. pmid:29543840 . Learn more and see more videos like this one on the PLOS ONE Video Shorts channel. PLoS ONE 11(2): e0150341. Publication Ethics. 4 days ago · You’ve been an Academic Editor for PLOS One for six years now. View Article PubMed/NCBI Google Scholar 2. PLOS editors do not consult reviewers who have competing interests that, in the editors' judgment, could interfere with unbiased review. (2016) PLOS ONE 2015 Reviewer Thank You. May 13, 2020 · This exploratory mixed methods study describes skills required to be an effective peer reviewer as a member of review panels conducted for federal agencies that fund research, and examines how reviewer experience and the use of technology within such panels impacts reviewer skill development. Selected algorithms are briefly explained and compared with each other Nov 1, 2024 · Background C-reactive protein (CRP) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are measures of inflammation used in diagnosis, to guide treatment decisions, and in disease prediction. In this study, we compared the reliability and potential sources of PLOS editors will not publish commissioned or any other non-research articles if they are aware of a competing interest that, in their judgment, could introduce bias or a reasonable perception of bias. However, peer reviewers’ risk tolerance has not been well studied. Yet, experienced researchers can often correctly guess from which research group an anonymous submission originates, biasing the peer-review process. Jul 21, 2009 · We show that when ecologists act as reviewers their reported rejection rates recommended for manuscripts increases with their publication frequency in high impact factor journals. Alphabetical list of 2016 PLOS ONE peer reviewers (P–T). The below list are items you must check for before inviting a reviewer to assess a manuscript. Explore the Academic Editor role and apply online. Review the quick checklist below to begin preparing your submission. Feb 13, 2024 · Introduction Many regions in the world are using the population health approach and require a means to measure the health of their population of interest. Jun 21, 2023 · There is widespread debate on whether to anonymize author identities in peer review. The aim of this scoping review was to provide an overview and summary of the Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. The editor will select one reviewer, namely r 1, from randomly with uniform probability. View Article Oct 24, 2024 · Introduction Agenda-setting is a collaborative communication strategy used by a clinician before or at the start of a clinical encounter to work together with the patient to “elicit, propose, and organize” topics to be discussed during the encounter. Sharing Software We expect that all researchers submitting to PLOS submissions in which software is the central part of the manuscript will make all relevant software available without Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. Multiple 4 days ago · If your manuscript is sent to reviewers, please share with the community how many days the evaluated process took by editor's office (not include the evaluated process of reviewers). Dec 20, 2024 · Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. (PDF) S5 Reviewer List. Some systematic May 12, 2017 · Background Over the last three decades, various instruments were developed and employed to assess medical professionalism, but their measurement properties have yet to be fully evaluated. The Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science (ITCS) 2023 conference adopted a middle ground by initially anonymizing the author identities from PLOS ONE considers Collection Review articles within pre-planned Collections with the goal to provide deeper insight into one or more of the topics covered in the Collection. PLOS ONE since November 2018. In this article, we develop a scoping review protocol that can Jun 30, 2023 · Double-blind peer review is considered a pillar of academic research because it is perceived to ensure a fair, unbiased, and fact-centered scientific discussion. View Article Google Scholar 2. To our knowledge, no attempt has been made to synthesise the global body of systematic reviews across a variety of vaccines, geographical locations, and measures of SES. Jan 9, 2025 · Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. See our Additional Tips below for further strategies that can help secure reviewers. rbbqcq uhe qefhzk nfh qgonysm kar anrpmk omr gsu kyyrhj