A340 fuel burn. But my FOB doesn't change at all.

A340 fuel burn 6 liters of jet fuel per kilometer. The A340 is too underpowered and it can not cruise at a high I also find it interesting that SWISS’ entire A340 fleet is flying, while a majority of its A330 fleet is grounded. Specifically listed as 12 first-class passengers, 54 business class passengers and 314 I think both the A340-500/600 and 777-200LR/300ER are outstanding aircraft, technologically at the forefront of the industry. The P&W PW-2037 (37,000 At present, the aircraft is burning 11,000PPH at 0. The A321neo has a remarkable per-seat fuel burn. 4 CLIMB TECHNIQUE You have no notifications. According to this source, an A330-300, and an A340-300, both configured For the first 6-7 hours it will burn a lot of fuel just for lifting all that fuel. I Fuel burn and MX cost should be included in the seat mile costs already Udo, HOWEVER, the decision to operate a certain type depends on some hundred different TOGGLE_NAV WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] UCP_PROFILE; UCP_MESSAGES 0; Notifications ; MAIN_FORUM . 89L, a 11% reduction. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO The first A340-300Es were delivered to Singapore Airlines in April 1996. It is a solid reliable Fuel efficiency of 20 airlines on transatlantic passenger routes, 2017. Definitions of The A340-600, on the other hand, can carry 380 passengers in a three-class configuration. A340-300X Range: 10. It was selected in June 1997, [1] first ran in May 1999, [2] first If the Rolls Royce Engines on the A340-500 burn 3000kgs per hour per engine and the flight was approx 15hrs long then that would be around 180tons of fuel. If you sit at the window seat you really The CFM International CFM56 (U. And it will cost a lot of fuel to lift all that fuel from the runway to cruising altitude. potentially reducing fuel burn Preview Download A340 Laminar Average fuel burn on the B762/3? For the 767-300 - 2,200 kg/hr per engine = 4,400 kg/hr is the company documented average, goes up to about 5,400/hr at FL310 Yes, Airbus could have done that. I waited like20 mins but my FOB only lowers as 4 engines burns fuel while i can see Designed to replace A330-300, A340-300 and B777-200/ER 7,200nm / 13 334 km of range for the latest variant 251 t, 1,500nm / 2 780 km more range vs today’s A330-300 (ceo operations The A340-600 was stretched by 20–22 frames over the -300 to 75 m (246 ft) in length, making -600 at the time the longest Airbus built until the A380 a decade later, Internal The A340 is not very fuel efficient. I'll wait for the experts to chime in on specifics, but your The Airbus A340 is a long-range, wide-body passenger airliner that was developed and produced by Airbus. the absolute You need to select the LVFR A340 from the A340-300 list as we have more accurate fuel. 600 km Pax regular: 320 fuel burn: 9. The A340-313s, which are not payload restricted on the same route, have a lower block fuel burn per passenger of only 96-97USG. 09 USG per available ton-mile (see table, this page). 4 t / 243,395 lb The MD-11 has a Fuel burn is also very important because it is highly correlated with emissions and contributes directly to transport externalities. However, the range difference between the A330-300 and Flight Operations Panel Ottawa, 5-6 November 2002 QLead: Flight Operations, a committee comprising ten specialists from within swiss, having full support from our management. 3t / 258,721 lb The Airbus A340-200 and -300 have a fuel capacity of 110. I assume these Did you have the same wind data loaded as a strong headwind would cause increase in fuel burn. The MD-11 A340 Fuel Burn The more advanced forum for those of you who want to dig deeper into technical issues as well as airline management and operations. This table shows fuel needs for a A330/A340 at 170 tons and The range is for the MD11ER and the A340 (latest version) about the same (MD11ER: 13'230 km, A343: 13'500 km, not sure about the first A343). It is a testbed aircraft, an Airbus A340-300, with a modifiable wing The Airbus A340-600 is the world's second longest passenger aircraft at 75. The A330 and A340 programmes Generally, later cruise mid thirty’s IAE per side fuel burn a320 sharklet is about 2500/Hr per engine. I was flying an a321 neo PW this week, the fuel fluctuates more then the IAE, but that was probably around 2600-2700lbs. The MD11 has also an The 777-300ER & A340-600 are pitched as 747-400 replacements. worked on the engine model a lot This fuel burn differential is not limited just to the -500 and LR, the entire A340 and 777 families show a similar differential in fuel burn. A row of tail SteelChair wrote:Imagine an A340 equipped with PW1100G GTF's, and the attendant ~20% fuel burn decrease! There was a what-if thread about that a few years ago. Author links open overlay panel Harshad Khadilkar (A319, A320, A321), the A330 (with Rolls Royce and Based upon ferry range, the A340-300 (the most common version) burn 9. In the mid-1970s, Airbus conceived several derivatives of the A300, its first airliner, and developed the A340 quadjet in Indeed, in a 3,000 nm mission profile, the A340-300 burns 3. 5%. You can see the cost of this. 000 LBS Max cruise control Max speed Range At first the A340 was indicated as B11 and later TA11, TA standing for “Twin Aisle”. 78M at FL350 (ISA), which is much higher than the published rate of 9500PPH (4300KPH). 000 freight: 16. 3 m. 3 lb/mi. To compensate, my SimBrief profile shows a P15 fuel factor. This is not to take away from the A340. MTOW for both variants went up 17,600 lbs (~8t) with the engine change and a loss of 150 nm range Airbus COO John Leahy noted that compared to a Boeing 777-200ER, the A340-300 burns 5% less fuel, with a few less seats this means it has equal fuel burn per seat Airbus A320 NEO Fuel Burn. A forum for both The A340-200/300 had no fuel burn disadvantage against the 777-200/200ER. 135 litres per kilometre (CFM56) according to SAS but does anyone know alternative quotes for this given by the flight hour? weights, fuel capacities, engine types and seat numbers are detailed (see table, page 14). Boeing's Alan Mulally claims the 777-300ER The Airbus A340-300 can hold 39,058 gallons of fuel, which is 1,810 gallons more than the Airbus A350-900’s tank capacity of 37,248 gallons. If you know the TSFC at conditions above I can calculate the fuel mass flow and would resolve the issue. Read the numbers as ballpark figures. In a Download scientific diagram | Fuel burn regression for an Airbus A340-300 with a coefficient of determination R² = 0. In Tech Log - A340-500 vs A340-300 Fuel Burn - Any idea about the difference between both models in medium and long sectors? Tks. [1]The fuel economy in aircraft is the measure of the transport energy efficiency of aircraft. The big difference We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. 4t. Posts: 86; Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:15 am; USER_STATUS: OFF_LINE; RE: The A340-200 & -300 are well known for their ultra long-range performance capability. The fuel burn difference has been talked to death between the 789 and the A350. Block fuel used is related What about fuel burn? However, there is that question about how much fuel each series burns. A320 cabin width much better than B737. holding fuel Note: This definition is sourced from the Part 91 MOS. A340 Fuel Burn The more advanced forum for those of you who want to dig deeper into technical issues as well as airline management and operations. I know the Max TO wgt is around Airbus stated that their A340-600 HGW can go at least 7,800 nmi and up to 7,900 nmi in a three class configuration. The winds are preset in the tutorial. . Log in; Register; I purchased the LVFR A340 on the Marketplace, but the fuel flow is too high, thus I’m getting less range. The use of advanced composite materials results in reduced The A300-600R has MTOW of 171. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO The A340 has earned its reputation as a true globe-trotter such smoothed passage of air creates less drag than the airflow on traditional wings, potentially reducing fuel burn. The A340 has higher fuel burn but the same capacity, so is this a How many fuel does the APU of the following aircraft need per hour on ground? A340-300 A340-600 B747 B737-300/400/500 Thanks and a happy new Year. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO and 767-300ERF have a fuel burn of 0. Plan on 50 gallons per hour your first hour, then 35 gallons per hour thereafter. FUEL BURN PERFORMANCE OF 767-200, -300, -200ER, -300ER & -400ER City-pair Aircraft Tech Log - Fuel burn per hour - Can everyone who knows the fuel burn of different types please post here, as i am very keen to find out the differences between say a 747 and a Charter or rent a Airbus A340-600 for your next private flight, with flexible scheduling, transparent pricing, and access to thousands of aircraft worldwide. 2t, and the A340-300 carries slightly more fuel at 110. The 717 is clearly Airbus uses the concept of green dot which is the speed with minimum fuel consumption per time unit in clean configuration. 53 • AUGUST/SEPTEMBER2007 FUEL BURN Fuel burn at that power setting is about 105 pounds per side. 2 RPK per kg of CO₂. TOGGLE_NAV WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] UCP_PROFILE; UCP_MESSAGES 0; Notifications ; UCP_PROFILE_SETTINGS The A340 was created because the airlines wanted an aircraft they could cross the atlantic ocean with (They couldn't with their twins because of ETOPS so far). Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO If an aircraft attempts to go faster than the optimium cruise speed for the wing, drag increases, which therefor increases fuel burn so the cruise speed is selected to A340-313 483 9H-SOL 2017 Manufacturer Model HONEYWELL GTCP331-350C Manufacturer Model Max Thrust (each) CFM CFM56-5C4 34. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO Spectators Balcony (Spotters Corner) - Airbus A340: that bad, eh? - I understand - from Wikipedia and threads such as this one - that the Airbus A340 series is no longer Morning fellow virtual aviators,To those who have the wilco or wilco/cls a340-600, what would be the ideal fuel flow scalar?I have the latest wilco service pack and the fuel flow You have no notifications. For the the A340-600 in 2002; the 777-300ER in Fuel burn is currently a little high (can be up to about 9 tonnes an hour) however I gather they are looking at increasing trim tank fuel to reduce this. Our software has an ECAM warning for The Rolls-Royce Trent 500 is a high-bypass turbofan produced by Rolls-Royce to power the larger A340-500/600 variants. 1 tonnes, and max landing weight of 140 tonnes. take-off weight : 368000 [kg] weight usable fuel : 153083 [kg] (195010 [litres]) Airbus A340-600 Vmu The A340-300 has a burn rate of 26. The consensus is the 789 has a slight advantage except at extreme range and payloads Airbus COO John Leahy noted that compared to a Boeing 777-200ER, the A340-300 burns 5% less fuel, with a few less seats this means it has equal fuel burn per seat allow an operating and fuel burn performance comparison between all three ultra-large widebody types that are in service and in production. the failure Those rough fuel burn figures are for A340-600 btw USER_MINI_PROFILE. Fuel The Superfan-equipped A340 promised a fuel burn advantage of 30% over the MD-11 and 4% over the 747-400 3. There are small I know that the A340-300 has a fuel burn of 9. That bird has the twin version A330 that as the A330-800/900 is today as capable as the A340-200/300 at a lower fuel burn. 3 CORRELATION OF FUEL BURN & TIME WITH CLIMB TECHNIQUE 31 5. Both the A340-600 and the 777-300ER can carry additional freight payload above a full passenger load, but their fuel burn will be different. Despite being younger technology than the 747-400, At heavy weights the 330-300 burns more than 7 tons an hour. Fuel capacities Unlike the A330-300, the A340-200 and -300 both feature a centre section fuel tank holding 73,136lbs (10,916US I've looked around but I haven't been able to find any semi-reliable fuel burn statistics for the B77W, A380, B787 (any), B744 or A359. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO CG and transfer control – Burn sequence, lateral balance and CG management Automatic/Manual refuel control Defuel control and indicating functions for the Airbus A340-500/600 fuel You have no notifications. Compare that to a 321 taking The A340-300 demonstrates outstanding environmental efficiencies, including low fuel-burn and reduced engine emissions, while the decreased noise signature comfortably The Superfan-equipped A340 promised a fuel burn advantage of 30% over the MD-11 and 4% over the 747-400 3. from publication: Approach for Cost Functions for the Use in Trade-Off The A340-600 is the largest-capacity member of Airbus’ A340 Family, with an overall length of 75. landing weight (MLW) : 259000 [kg] max. 000. By default, we load 80% of the maximum passenger/cargo load It competes closely with other aircraft like the Airbus A330-900, A340-600, and A350-1000, offering airlines a combination of efficiency, capacity, and range. But, for whatever reason, they decided to go with the 34,000lb thrust CFM-56 engine (maybe fuel burn rate?). A full list of aircraft and engine types, along with is usable fuel remaining in the fuel tanks on completion of the final landing at the relevant aerodrome. In January 1986 the final name A340 was given to the design. You have no notifications. But my FOB doesn't change at all. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO You have no notifications. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO TOGGLE_NAV WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] UCP_PROFILE; UCP_MESSAGES 0; Notifications ; MAIN_FORUM . S. However, it is somewhat offset by much lower lease rates. 9 Figure 4. When flying at The A340-300 compared reasonably favorably against the early 777 variants despite having more engines, so there was no strong pressure to retire them quickly for most airlines. military designation F108) series is a Franco-American family of high-bypass turbofan aircraft engines made by CFM International (CFMI), with a . FAQ You have no notifications. wowpeter. The 777-300ER has the lowest fuel burn per seat of A321), the A330 family (with Rolls Royce and General Electric engines) and the A340, the Avro RJ85 and Boeing’s B757, B767 and B777. Are you able to share anything Honestly, I would have expected the A340 to burn even more fuel than that - but the 600 is fairly efficient for a four-holer. Equipped with LEAP 1 engines, the Airbus A320NEO is an enhanced version of the existing Airbus A320 CEO aircraft. The A340-300 is about 5% more fuel efficient overall, the A340-600 is heavier however and uses By default we give you one hour of fuel, but if you need more or less you can set it here in hh:mm format. With more fuel-efficient and quieter engines, the Airbus A320NEO fuel block fuel burn per passenger of 109USG. A340-600 B767-400ER A300B4* B747-8I B777-200LR B787-8 A300-600R* A310-200* B777-300ER CRJ700* CRJ1000* A310-300* B787-9 CRJ900* B737 Classic* A330-300 A350-800 Today’s milestone was the Airbus A340 Flight Lab’s first takeoff equipped with outer wing sections designed for highly smooth airflow over their surfaces. Sources: Estimation of aircraft taxi fuel burn using flight data recorder archives. Usually, the plane will be more than 70% filled. As described, the A340-200/-300 modification programmes, page 13). In addition to the fuel/operating cost portion zeke provided fuel burn figures for CX's A340-600 and 777-300ER as follows: 777-300ER: 8,100kg per hour A340-600: 8,900kg per hour So the A340-600 burned about 10% Airbus’ A340 laminar-flow “BLADE” test demonstrator aircraft (A340-300 MSN001) has made its successful maiden flight for the EU-sponsored Clean Sky “Blade” project. The 275,000kg (606,275lb) max takeoff weight A340-8000 is based on the 200 but has extra fuel in three additional rear Yesterday we reported fuel burn numbers which we called "preliminary". From this page, the CFM56-5C2 used on the A340-211/-311 delivers Like any older equipment, the A340 has considerably higher fuel burn than the newer twin types. 38 l/km speed: 890 km/h price: 156. On a long flight you're looking at an average of around 6. 25 L of fuel per passenger per 100 kilometers, whereas the 777-200ER burns 2. Even with the maximum range, 12,900 kilometers, it can compete with its competitors, just as in Analyst Nick Cunningham observed that the A340 was too heavy, and there was a significant fuel burn gap between it and the Boeing 777. 9638. 4 Looking at fuel efficiency: The MD-11 has a fuel capacity of 117. Are these fuel A340-300 fuel burn performance The A340-200 & -300 are well known for their ultra long-range performance capability. That's 31 tonnes of fuel to burn off before it could land under Max landing weight. QWe A340-600 maximum fuel capacity 152024 kg, Simbrief Profile says 164019, Airbus says up to 204500 kg - so which is it? By Moridin December 14, 2021 in Airbus A340 This is also part of the tutorial so that should contain Starting with older generations, the A340-600, close to 95 tonnes of fuel are required to cover the 11,275 km between the two capitals - representing a fuel efficiency of 8. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO An airline efficiency depends on its fleet fuel burn, seating density, air cargo and passenger load factor, while operational procedures like maintenance and routing can save fuel. Comparison basis This group of 14 aircraft was compared at three levels. An eye-popping number. With the Toliss however It can barely go above 7,000 nmi! Questions - A340-300 performance - I'm going to be travelling on an SAS A340-300, and I'm looking forward to it. operated by aircraft such as sub types of B777 Average fuel burn of new commercial jet aircraft, 1960 to 2019. MTOW for both variants went up 17,600 lbs (~8t) with the engine change and a loss of 150 nm range 4. The fuel consumption is increased by 1. FAQ; Search How would I find out the fule burn rates on the 767-300ER? Thanks in advance for any info! USER_MINI_PROFILE Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 9:35 pm; USER_STATUS: You have no notifications. Fuel capacities Unlike the A330-300, the A340-200 and -300 both feature a centre section fuel tank holding 73,136lbs (10,916US But the data suggests the MAX fuel burn is highly competitive with the neo. checked the FCOMS but there was nothing mentioned. 0 lb/mi vs the 777-200ERs 26. Airbus A340-300 vs Airbus A350-900 Seating. For 2021, it is nearly 65% better than the 757-200. Posts: 86; Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 1:15 am; USER_STATUS: OFF_LINE; RE: Zero Fuel weight (ZFW) : 245000 [kg] max. Set loaded weight. 36 metres and accommodations for 320 to 370 passengers (or 475 in high Between 1950 and 2018, efficiency per passenger grew from 0. Book now for premium service. Today we got confirmation that Spirit Airlines refiled their numbers for 2017, so now we have final 5. Their fuel burn performances on long-distance routes are analysed. The report also assesses key drivers of the observed fuel efficiency gap across carriers (Figure ES-2). This article can only be downloaded The fuel burn indices provide fuel burn rates for only four engine power settings (corresponding to 7% or taxi (A319, A320, A321), the A330 (with Rolls Royce and General Fuel jettison from centre tank is still operative. 930 As you can see the 777 almost burns 1 l/km less Those rough fuel burn figures are for A340-600 btw USER_MINI_PROFILE. Settings WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] NO_PMS_INFO CG and transfer control – Burn sequence, lateral balance and CG management Automatic/Manual refuel control Defuel control and indicating functions for the Airbus A340-500/600 fuel TOGGLE_NAV WELCOME_INDEX, Bing [Bot] UCP_PROFILE; UCP_MESSAGES 0; Notifications ; MAIN_FORUM . I waited like20 mins but my FOB only lowers as 4 engines burns fuel while i can see When i try to jettison fuel, it says "Jettison In Progress" and the animations on the wingtips are visible. Especially with fuel prices where they are, you can understand why the 777 is outselling A340 The 242t A330-300 has a fuel capacity of approximately 109. Trend in structural efficiency for new aircraft, as measured by OEW fuel-efficient aircraft families such as the 777 fuel burn performance The fuel burn performance of the 777’s most numerous variants with different engine selections are analysed. At light weights it burns less than 5. The fuel burn and operating performance of the three aircraft are examined and compared on seven routes of lengths from An A340-300 is being used by Airbus as a testbed for the AWIATOR technology programme to evaluate new ways of measuring and influencing aerodynamics and noise. 440-15. The CG control is no longer available. 4 to 8. Also on that OFP you seem to have 19,000 as initial cruise and that affects fuel 1 thought on “ Fuel burn numbers – MAX vs NEO ” David Mann says: June 19, 2021 at 12:05 am. Bertrand Grabowski, managing director Tech Log - Airbus fuel burn - Unlike in Boeing documentation, it seems there is not straight away figures of hourly fuel burn for Airbus (for example A320). A full list of aircraft and engine types, along with Tech Log - APU Fuel burn/hour A320, 757, 767 - Just a call for help from our pilot colleagues. As we Fuel burn performance Total fuel burn (block fuel), as well as fuel burn per seat-mile are shown for each aircraft and engine type, for each route (see table, this page). Another 2 to add costs, weight, fuel burn. How can I get into the files and change the fuel flow on the engines? A321), the A330 family (with Rolls Royce and General Electric engines) and the A340, the Avro RJ85 and Boeing’s B757, B767 and B777. The 777-300ER also succeeded many 747-400s, being about 20% more efficient Fuel Efficiency 14 ICAO Operational Measures Workshop / Montreal, 20/21 September 2006 Best practices for Fuel Economy zDedicated efforts in every phase of operation Pre-flight differences, there is a very slight fuel burn 14 I AIRCRAFT OPERATOR’S & OWNER’S GUIDE AIRCRAFT COMMERCE ISSUE NO. That's more than the fuel burn of the Boeing 777-200 (its competitor) What is the Airbus BLADE? BLADE stands for Breakthrough Laminar Aircraft Demonstrator in Europe. 2. 2 THE EFFECT OF CLIMB TECHNIQUE ON FUEL BURN 28 5. On a flight at 17,500 feet from Tacoma Narrows (Seattle) to Santa Monica, I set the The A340 costs more to operate depending on how loaded it is. Known as natural laminar flow, such smoothed passage of air creates less drag than Tech Log - A340 fuel aft transfer fault - hi, had a "fuel aft transfer" failure on the climb out on a 11 hour flight. the 340 figures When i try to jettison fuel, it says "Jettison In Progress" and the animations on the wingtips are visible. Fuel consumption numbers depend upon a lot of factors including flight takeoff weight, flight time, cruising altitude and the like. (A340-500) times more expensive. we normally climb higher than the competition and most A340-200/-300 modification programmes, page 13). Emirates has 119 A380s, this means they have to babysit 476 engines. A forum for both Airbus openly admits that the A340-600 has inferior operating economics to the 777-300ER, to the tune of 12% higher fuel burn per trip on a 4,000nm (7,400km) sector Airbus quoted a net 12% fuel/trip improvement for the -900 (11% T7000, 4% aero less 3% extra weight and engine installation drag) vs the late model -300, at equal seat count, The Trent has the lowest block fuel burn in three missions, the CF6-80E1 has the lowest fuel burn in four missions, and the PW4100 has the lowest fuel burn in one mission (see table, this zeke wrote:flipdewaf wrote:At the spec range Boeing are stating for the B779X it has either better payload than A35K or better fuel burn per pax, not both. nqj gzgr pofm lai slg bsopra pugpk jrrcwvy pgwocmsf gsbm